Diana K,
You're right. I wasn't very clear. Maybe this will be a better explanation...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diana K Water that passes through the UV several times in a day (or even in an hour) is not really going to kill something that needs to be exposed for a long time. |
In my amateur web searching, I didn't find any documentation about the efficacy of multiple passes. All of the info I found was about wattage and one-pass dwell time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diana K Slowing the water flow will do this. The 'bugs' will stay exposed to the light for a longer time all at once. |
I've slowed the water flow by letting the filter get dirty. Consumer mis-understanding is the only reason I can think of that the mfgs don't advertise how _slowly_ they can pump the water...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diana K With shorter exposure they might heal in between trips. |
Right, they might. I have no way of knowing if the 15-20 minutes between trips through the UV is long enough for some of these organisms to heal themselves.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diana K Also, I see an inconsistency in your comments: You are hoping that running it 24/7 will increase the exposure of the pests to the UV, yet your plan is to run it intermittently. |
Sorry for the confusion -- I meant to point out that none of the info I could find took into account the possibility of 24x7 operation and multiple cycles of the UV in judging how many watts you need or the dwell time.
I am running mine intermittently for these reasons:
a) I don't expect any introduction of new pathogens, so running it all the time seems like overkill. If the water cycles 3x per hour, and 3-5 passes are fatal, then running it long enough so that I get 90% odds of each organism passing the light 10x per day seems ok.
b) The UV does affect the growth of floating plants (hornwort is dropping needles and the duckweed growth has slowed down)
In short, I'm still guessing and trying this stuff out... and making lots of assumptions.
Cheers,
-ObiQuiet