fuzzyletters

which book was it?

 

---

To avoid seeing this ad in our forum please register at AquaticPlantCentral.com

By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features.

Jimbo205

He has a bunch.
Google his name and indulge yourself either at the local library or order online. Enjoy.

Now I have a question about High Tech vs. Low Tech.

From what I have read and REREAD in Diana Walstad's book (also a classic that I reread about every 2 months, no exaggeration here!);

plants take care of or 'eat' or consume nitrates. They prefer ammonium and expend energy to utilize nitrates, but they do consume nitrates.

Why do I continue to read about nitrates being a concern in tanks with plants in them?

I don't get it.

If you have plants, nitrates should NOT be a problem; correct?

Or is there something that I missed while re-reading that chapter again (very, very good.)?

Kelley

I think that SUFFICIENT nitrates are the problem. When you have a high light set-up, your fish do not contribute enough nitrogenous wastes to nourish the plants. Of course, you can always have to much. It's all about balance.

gf225

High-tech offers limitless plant choice.

Low-tech has limited plant choice.

That doesn't mean one is better than the other.

I've seen much better low-tech aquascapes......not many though.

gf225

Ha, ha.

I run 1 wpg T8 with CO2 mist at 20ppm. Soil-based substrate, TMG 2x week, tap loaded with NO3 and PO4. 1/3 water change per week. Low fish load.

What's that? Low or high-tech?

Probably high. The plants (crypts, ferns and anubias) are all pearling after a few hours.

Growth is slow enough though, minimal maintenace except the weekly water change and 2x week dosing. So could be low-tech....?

Or mid-tech?

Ha, ha.

Jimbo205

George, it doesn't matter. You aquariums kick butt. Nuff said.

wakemenow

Yep. I agree. It's definitely a difference in personal philosophies.

Homer_Simpson

It also depends on how much time, money, and effort that you are prepared to put forth. I have done both, and hands down, low tech is the least costly and takes the least effort. If I were retired, I would definitely go high tech as I would have more than enough time to manage it and any problems that may arise. With very limited time on my hands, I would go low tech.

howie

I am switching from high tech to low tech and cutting down the number of tanks I have. Have a baby coming and all my tanks take a good 4 hours of maintenance every week. Not to mention the daily dosing. I have a 10 gallon low tech shrimp tank with 1wpg, no dosing and weekly water changes and it is doing the best. I am getting tired of pruning and fighting algae.

dwalstad

Welcome aboard!

 

To avoid seeing this ad in our forum please register at AquaticPlantCentral.com By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features.