Go Back   Aquatic Plant Central > Special Interest Forums > Fertilizing
User Name
Password

Advertise on APC

Fertilizing Science of Aquatic Fertilizing - Discuss fertilizing techniques and proper aquatic plant nutrition here.

View Poll Results: Which one is better?
Flourish 25 55.56%
TMG 20 44.44%
Voters: 45. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-10-2004, 05:15 AM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Raul-7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lomita, CA
Posts: 1,559
iTrader Ratings: 9
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
Raul-7 is a regular member
Plant Points: 21010
Default Flourish vs TMG?

Which one is better? I've noticed TMG is much more expensive for the same amount, 500mL: $20 opposed to $5 for Flourish. And TMG has K, which I don't think Flourish has, but Flourish has many more trace elements. So which tends to give better results, and why is it better?
Raul-7 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Advertisement [Remove Advertisement]

Old 02-10-2004, 05:55 AM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
jerseyjay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 811
iTrader Ratings: 9
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
jerseyjay is a regular member
Plant Points: 12385
Default Re: Flourish vs TMG?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raul-7
I've noticed TMG is much more expensive for the same amount, 500mL: $20 opposed to $5 for Flourish.
Just FYI,

Bigalsonline.com

TMG
500ml - $10.99
5L - $49.99 (THE BEST BUY !!!)

Flourish
500ml - $7.49
2L - $21.99

Personally I prefer TMG which I have been successfully using for few years.
jerseyjay is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2004, 06:17 AM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
MiamiAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 3,887
iTrader Ratings: 4
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
MiamiAG is a regular member
Plant Points: 17805
Default

I like TMG cause I like my buddy Claus.
MiamiAG is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2004, 08:54 AM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
aquaverde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Mid-Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 243
iTrader Ratings: 0
aquaverde is a regular member
Plant Points: 3600
Default

I saw a table posted not too long ago where the ingredients and concentrations were posted for these two and PlantexCSM. IIRC, the Plantex and TMG were similar, and Flourish is different in composition. I alternate Plantex and Flourish.
aquaverde is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2004, 09:21 AM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Raul-7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lomita, CA
Posts: 1,559
iTrader Ratings: 9
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
Raul-7 is a regular member
Plant Points: 21010
Default

When using TMG, would I still need to dose for trace elements seprately? Jay, have you noticed any differences in growth since the switch?
Raul-7 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2004, 09:55 AM   #6 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
toshi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: San Francisco CA
Posts: 18
iTrader Ratings: 1
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
toshi is a regular member
Plant Points: 3600
Default

I used TMG for some time, then switched to Kent, then Flourish (primarily for the additional micros). Solely via observation (and completely anecdotally), I believe that Flourish iron doesn't remain available to plants as long as Fe in the old Kent formulation, chelated via edta.

Most of my tanks are moderately to strongly lit. I dose Flourish on a daily basis and notice a light, whitish cast imparted on water clarity on some days after dosing. It's not something just anyone would notice, but if you look at your setups daily and are familiar with their clarity it is definitely visible. I've begun dosing Flourish in the evenings (after lights out) to mitigate potential breakdown of its stabilizers and so that I don't have to see this opaqueness

In addition to Flourish, I use a couple of hydroponics-based micronutrient supplements with Fe just to cover my bases.


Erik Leung
toshi is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2004, 09:58 AM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Sir_BlackhOle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Posts: 1,710
iTrader Ratings: 0
Sir_BlackhOle is a regular member
Plant Points: 4150
Default

I am still new to this all, but I have been using Flourish and am very happy with the growth of my plants. I am interested to see which product wins the pole in the end though.
Sir_BlackhOle is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2004, 04:43 PM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: the Swamp
Posts: 2,069
iTrader Ratings: 1
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
plantbrain is a regular member
Plant Points: 4100
Default

I started with Kent, did not care much for it, switched to Sera, I liked it, but cost too much, switched to TMG since EVERYONE else was using it and I did not want to make things different vs other folks I was discussing PO4 etc with.

I really liked TMG but I also really like Flourish.
I'm not quite sure which I like the best, each has a slight, subtle quality that's tough to pin down in a GENERAL term/s, much more an individual tank observation.

I add a "secret sauce" on top of the traces sometimes folks add a tad bit more Flourish iron etc.

But I'm staying with Flourish/TMG for suggestions sinc eI have folks that have only TMG around their neck of the woods and unfortuantely, I'm buds with both Claus and Greg.

So, I like them both

Regards,
Tom Barr
plantbrain is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2004, 03:18 AM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Raul-7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lomita, CA
Posts: 1,559
iTrader Ratings: 9
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
Raul-7 is a regular member
Plant Points: 21010
Default

So both are equally good?
Raul-7 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2004, 04:00 AM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
MiamiAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 3,887
iTrader Ratings: 4
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
MiamiAG is a regular member
Plant Points: 17805
Default

For those that don't have both:

Tropica Master Grow contents: K 0.79%, Mg 0.39%, S 1.01%, B 0.004%, Cu 0.006%, Fe 0.07%, Mn 0.04%, Mo 0.002% Zn 0.002%. HEEDTA and DTPA as chelators.

Flourish contents: Total Nitrogen (N): 0.04%; Available Phosphate (as P2O5): < 0.0100%; Soluble Potash (K2O): <0.0600%; Ca (Calcium): 0.1736%; Mg (Magnesium): 0.1154%; S (Sulfur): 0.2773%; B (Boron): 0.0096%; Br (Bromine(as bromide): 0.0001; Cl (Chlorine(as chloride): 1.15%; Co (Cobalt): 0.0004%; Cu (Copper): 0.0001%; I (Iodine (as iodide)): 0.0001%; Fe (Iron/Ferrous gluconate): 0.3886%; Mn (Manganese): 0.0125%; Mo (Molybdenum): 0.0015%; Ni (Nickel): 0.00036%; Rb (Rubidium): 0.0001%; Na (Sodium): 0.0743%; Sn (Tin): 0.000030%; V (Vanadium): 0.000030%; Zn (Zinc): 0.0004%; Arginine: 0.016%; Glutamate: 0.09%; Lysine: 0.03%; Tyrosine: 0.019%; Choline: 0.0004%; Inositol: 0.0011%; Biotin: 0.0004%; Niacin: 0.025%; Pantothenate: 0.0070%; RiboÅavin: 0.0020%;Thiamine: 0.0020%; Vitamin B12: 0.00009%; Vitamin C: 1.0%

Flourish does not contain nitrate or phosphate per se, but it does supply a nitrogen source, the Nitrogen equivalent being 400 ppm in the bottle. Phosphorous is not available as free phosphate but as phosphate
esters (100 ppm). Flourish does in fact contain potassium (600 ppm)
but like with the iron, you wouldn't want to use Flourish as the sole
source of potassium maintenance if the potassium is heavily utilized.
MiamiAG is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Aquatic Plant Central > Special Interest Forums > Fertilizing > Flourish vs TMG?

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Aquatic Plant Forum Replies Last Post
Flourish overdose? Bob Vivian Seachem 3 01-06-2005 11:03 AM
Flourish and vacation? dennis Seachem 1 12-27-2004 05:01 AM
Flourish Excel and Pressurized CO2 C_perugiae Seachem 17 11-05-2004 01:02 PM
Dosing suggestions with the whole (almost) Flourish line? Gomer Fertilizing 8 10-18-2004 04:40 AM
Seachem Flourish questions AV8TOR Fertilizing 1 04-07-2004 09:09 AM

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0

Copyright © 2006 - 2009 Aquatic Plant Central | About Aquatic Plant Central | Advertising Opportunities | Legal | A member of the Crowdgather Forum Community
Created by Blue Moose Designs