Go Back   Aquatic Plant Central > Special Interest Forums > Fertilizing
User Name
Password

Advertise on APC

Fertilizing Science of Aquatic Fertilizing - Discuss fertilizing techniques and proper aquatic plant nutrition here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-09-2006, 11:59 AM   #21 (permalink)
Moderator
 
MatPat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 3,819
iTrader Ratings: 34
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
MatPat is a valuable member of the communityMatPat is a valuable member of the community
Plant Points: 133525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bert H
I can't see the chart, just broken link symbol.
The link seems to be working now. Maybe we can persuade Hoppy to add it to this site.
MatPat is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Advertisement [Remove Advertisement]

Old 03-09-2006, 12:17 PM   #22 (permalink)
Administrator
 
BryceM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: South Central Idaho, USA
Posts: 4,262
iTrader Ratings: 42
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
BryceM is an inspiration to us allBryceM is an inspiration to us allBryceM is an inspiration to us allBryceM is an inspiration to us all
Plant Points: 178534
Default

One word of caution......... It's still important to keep an eye on the KH, especially if you need to supplement NaHCO3 due to very soft tapwater. My tap KH is <1. If you let it get too low, you risk a pH crash. Also, both your degassed CO2 levels and your tank CO2 levels will be quite low. Fish can compensate for elevated CO2 levels using certain metabolic pathways, and they can compensate for gradual changes in osmotic load, but at some point they just can't compensate for living in acid. Once pH starts getting down into the high 5's I think you'll see problems in most fish and some of the plants we keep.

IMO a KH of at least 3, seems prudent. I keep mine between 4 and 5.

Also, many people are reporting recently that they maintain enormously high CO2 levels to battle BBA. Their fish seem to do just fine, but when they add new ones they go into shock. It's probably something like opening the window of an airliner at 28,000 feet - people pass out pretty quick without O2, yet climbers have done Everest (29,035 feet) without O2. The trick is a gradual ascent over several weeks to allow the body time to compensate. Introducing new fish might become difficult, making a gradual transition mandatory.

Last edited by BryceM : 03-09-2006 at 12:24 PM.
BryceM is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2006, 01:53 PM   #23 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 7
iTrader Ratings: 0
Navi is a regular member
Plant Points: 3600
Default

It seems to me this theory is totally based on an assumed equilibrium of 3 mg/l. That's a big assumption IMO. If the assumed equilibrium was off by 1 mg/l either way, the chart would be totally invalid.

Or am I missing something here?
Navi is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2006, 02:13 PM   #24 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: São Paulo - Brazil
Posts: 4
iTrader Ratings: 0
MarcosB is a regular member
Plant Points: 3600
Default

Under normal circumstances the CO2 equilibrated with the atmosphere should be 0.5 ppm, and the equation to determine its concentration as a function of pH variation before and after aeration is: [CO2] = 10^(pHdiff – 0,3).
MarcosB is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2006, 04:30 PM   #25 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
banderbe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Maple Grove, MN
Posts: 728
iTrader Ratings: 25
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
banderbe is a regular member
Plant Points: 17500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MatPat
I agree with both of you on the testing. Even with good kits and meters there are some variables, not to mention human error, and no one test will be perfect. I rarely test unless something appears to be wrong but this can be a difficult concept to grasp for those without much experience. When you are new to the hobby, it is nice to have some "numbers" to go by until you gain a bit of experience.

According to the KH/pH chart, my levels are over 200ppm (LaMotte Alkalinity test and Hanna 98129 meter) and if I were to follow the advice at keeping my levels in the 30-40ppm range, I would have massive BBA in my tank. Go ahead and ask how I know this

My fish do not gasp at the 200ppm range (90ppm with Hoppy's method) but new fish succumb very quickly to these levels. I have been increasing the CO2 very slowly for a long time now and it appears that the fish may be able to adapt somewhat.

Raising the CO2 levels can be very dificult for someone new to the hobby to understand. I myself was a victim of this when I first started following the advice of folks to increase my CO2 levels. Go ahead and ask how I know this too I think what Hoppy and the rest of us are trying to arrive at is a simpler way for beginners to determine CO2 levels and not kill off their fish!

If a new method can help only one person get into the hobby and stay here, then I think it is a worth while discussion
Ditto, I have 86 ppm CO2 according to the charts, and I know for a fact that my KH is 18 (city water report and confirmed by test kits) and I am reasonably sure my pH is at or around 6.8 (AP and RedSea kits agree).

But, three of my fish died last week. Oddly the others were fine and never showed any signs of stress.
banderbe is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2006, 04:39 PM   #26 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 20
iTrader Ratings: 0
R0bert is a regular member
Plant Points: 3600
Default

Quote:
Under normal circumstances the CO2 equilibrated with the atmosphere should be 0.5 ppm, and the equation to determine its concentration as a function of pH variation before and after aeration is: [CO2] = 10^(pHdiff – 0,3).
MarcosB can you show me how you arrived at 0.5ppm? I worked it out even lower than that, but I'm not certain about my constants.
R0bert is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2006, 04:48 PM   #27 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
hoppycalif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sacramento, CA, USA
Posts: 5,208
iTrader Ratings: 20
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
hoppycalif is a valuable member of the communityhoppycalif is a valuable member of the communityhoppycalif is a valuable member of the community
Plant Points: 227345
Default

We should be able to measure the equilibrium concentration of CO2 when a water sample sits open all night, by using distilled or demineralized water, with a bit of baking soda in it for KH. Doing this for a couple or so different KH's should settle the question on whether this method is at all accurate. I plan to try this tonight, but I hope others can try it too. A gallon of distilled or demineralized water is pretty cheap.
hoppycalif is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2006, 04:01 AM   #28 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: São Paulo - Brazil
Posts: 4
iTrader Ratings: 0
MarcosB is a regular member
Plant Points: 3600
Default

Robert
The composition of CO2 in atmosphere is ca. 380 ppm (0.038 %) which gives a partial pressure of 0.00038 atm. The Henry´s law constant for CO2 is 3.38x10^-2.
Thus, using the Henry´s equation we have:[CO2]aq = 0.00038 x 0.0338 = 1.3 x 10^-5 mol / L of CO2.
Converting to mass:
1.3x10^-5 x 44 = 0.00056 g/L= 0.56 mg/L (ppm)
MarcosB is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2006, 04:52 AM   #29 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 20
iTrader Ratings: 0
R0bert is a regular member
Plant Points: 3600
Default

Thanks MarcosB. I made a mistake with the mass conversion.

The last post in this article explains the method quite clearly: http://www.thekrib.com/Plants/CO2/kh-ph-co2-chart.html

Last edited by R0bert : 03-10-2006 at 04:59 AM.
R0bert is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2006, 05:13 AM   #30 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
MiamiAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 3,877
iTrader Ratings: 4
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
MiamiAG is a regular member
Plant Points: 17105
Default

Hobby,

Just upload the chart to our Photo Album and link to it from there. Our image hosting is free to members.

Excellent discussion by the way.
MiamiAG is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Aquatic Plant Central > Special Interest Forums > Fertilizing > Another CO2 Chart to try

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Aquatic Plant Forum Replies Last Post
CO2 fluctuations in a non-CO2 tank niko General Aquarium Plants Discussions 8 02-21-2006 03:01 AM
Validity of CO2 chart BryceM Fertilizing 6 01-10-2006 02:14 PM
CO2 revelations plantbrain General Aquarium Plants Discussions 22 10-19-2005 05:51 PM
CO2 tank pressure chart bharada Equipment 1 03-24-2005 10:14 PM

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0

Copyright © 2006 - 2009 Aquatic Plant Central | About Aquatic Plant Central | Advertising Opportunities | Legal | A member of the Crowdgather Forum Community
Created by Blue Moose Designs