Go Back   Aquatic Plant Central > Special Interest Forums > Fertilizing

Fertilizing Science of Aquatic Fertilizing - Discuss fertilizing techniques and proper aquatic plant nutrition here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-01-2004, 08:32 PM   #1 (permalink)
Moved on
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,623
iTrader Ratings: 8
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
Robert Hudson is a regular member
Plant Points:
Default

What method do you use to fertilize your plants?
Robert Hudson is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
Reply With Quote

Advertisement [Remove Advertisement]
Old 09-01-2004, 08:32 PM   #2 (permalink)
Moved on
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,623
iTrader Ratings: 8
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
Robert Hudson is a regular member
Plant Points:
Default

What method do you use to fertilize your plants?
Robert Hudson is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2004, 04:05 AM   #3 (permalink)
Member of SCAPE
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Juan Capistrano, CA
Posts: 832
iTrader Ratings: 3
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
IUnknown is a regular member
Plant Points:
Default

What about Jeff Kropp's "just in time" method?
IUnknown is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2004, 07:55 AM   #4 (permalink)
Moved on
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,623
iTrader Ratings: 8
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
Robert Hudson is a regular member
Plant Points:
Default

If you are serious, by all means share it with us, HERE. Explain it, Quote him, or get Jeff to come here and tell us about it!
Robert Hudson is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2004, 08:37 AM   #5 (permalink)
Member of SCAPE
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Juan Capistrano, CA
Posts: 832
iTrader Ratings: 3
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
IUnknown is a regular member
Plant Points:
Default

Here is the thread Robert,
http://www.aquaticplantcentral.com/f...pic.php?t=2299
IUnknown is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2004, 08:41 AM   #6 (permalink)
Moved on
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,623
iTrader Ratings: 8
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
Robert Hudson is a regular member
Plant Points:
Default

Now how did I know you were going to do that...I must be physicic! Should we talk about it here or on APC?

I don't see anything in that thread about a theory from Jeff. Its all Toms ramblings, which is fine, but I do not see a defined approach in that conversation. Could you just explain it a little, please?
Robert Hudson is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2004, 02:19 PM   #7 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 0
iTrader Ratings: 0
imported_Edward is a regular member
Plant Points:
Default

Hi Robert,

Perpetual Preservation System by Edward, is not included in this poll.

Many aquatic hobbyists are looking for this method that doesn't require large water changes. The reason may be time or size of tanks.

Entering elements proportionally allows one to perpetually preserve an optimum balance of nutrients.

A fixed ratio of elements, dosed every day at very small quantity to maintain desired concentration in the water column. Twice a month or so, testing only for NO3 and PO4 determines what to dose the following month.
--------------------
Standard Dosing:
NO3 - 0.75
PO4 - 0.25
K - 1.00
Ca - 0.10
Mg - 0.10
--------------------
If testing of water column gives elevated NO3 level, then switch to NO3-FREE Dosing:
NO3 - 0.00
PO4 - 0.25
K - 1.00
Ca - 0.10
Mg - 0.10
--------------------
If testing of water column gives elevated PO4 level, then switch to PO4-FREE Dosing:
NO3 - 0.75
PO4 - 0.00
K - 1.00
Ca - 0.10
Mg - 0.10
--------------------
--------------------
These solutions can be made easily as follow.

Standard
0.75:0.25:1.00 - in 500ml
KNO3 - 20.38 g
KH2PO4 - 5.97 g
K2SO4 - 15.74 g

NO3-FREE
0.00:0.25:1.00 - in 500ml
KNO3 - 0.00 g
KH2PO4 - 5.97
K2SO4 - 33.30 g

PO4-FREE
0.75:0.00:1.00 - in 500ml
KNO3 - 20.38 g
KH2PO4 - 0.00 g
K2SO4 - 19.56 g


CaCl - 4.62 g in 500ml
MgSO4 - 16.90 g in 500ml


These solutions make rated ppm at 3 ml / 100 l .
Dosing the same amount of ml for, NO3:PO4:K:Ca:Mg solutions, makes the right nutrient spectrum for plants.

For 50 gallon tank at 1 Watt per gallon, dosing 3 ml every day keeps nutrients steady. For 130 gallon tank at 3 Watt per gallon, dosing 6 ml.
This system is efficient and easy to do.

Thank you for your time,
Edward
imported_Edward is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2004, 11:56 PM   #8 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Israel
Posts: 60
iTrader Ratings: 0
aviel is a regular member
Plant Points:
Default

Edward,

How come with my 200 gallons tank I feel I need to measure 2-3 times a week while you test once a month??? There are spikes of consumption you know and your nitrate could bottom out after one week, not one month!

I test and re-fill to my desired target 2-3 times a week. I try to stick to the same target for two weeks in order to give time for the plants to get used to the new dosing. If nitrate doesn't drop at a rate of at least 1 ppm per day then I know I have a problem that I have to look for or otherwise something shall attack my tank. On the downside - I feel that I am becoming a slave. If I plan on going abroad for 3 weeks - then that's a sure suicide for my tank.

Also - Tom Bar's "rambling" sounds perfectly logical to me. Of course I am just a newbie so who am I to judge. It is just that "rambling" doesn't sound positive. But again maybe I need to blame my poor english.

What bother me with Tom's approach though is that he is saying - go ahead and reset your tank. Replacing 30-50-70% of the water - doesn't reset things. If I had 10 ppm NO3 before then I shall end up with 7 or 5 or 3 ppm respectively. So this is why I can't buy the "method" that he is suggesting.

Aviel.
aviel is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2004, 04:11 AM   #9 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 0
iTrader Ratings: 0
imported_Edward is a regular member
Plant Points:
Default

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Aviel Livay:
Edward,

How come with my 200 gallons tank I feel I need to measure 2-3 times a week while you test once a month??? There are spikes of consumption you know and your nitrate could bottom out after one week, not one month! <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
You have huge swings in nutrient ratio because instability. Your dosing is not consistent and large water changes cause stress on plants and fish. This is why we use the Perpetual Preservation System. When fresh nutrients are available every day, plants have time to take up all they need during that day. There is no day without complete spectrum. Plants get saturated and adjusted to stable environment. Uptake ratio and quantity will become more stable and predictable.

There is no need to go to levels close to zero. You can keep any levels you like, NO3 30 ppm and PO4 2 ppm if you are expecting to go away for 2 weeks. This concentration will guarantee available nutrients when you come back. Then you test it and go from there.

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>On the downside - I feel that I am becoming a slave. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Exactly right, changing water is not time well spent.

Thank you,
Edward
imported_Edward is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2004, 05:47 AM   #10 (permalink)
Member of SCAPE
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Juan Capistrano, CA
Posts: 832
iTrader Ratings: 3
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
IUnknown is a regular member
Plant Points:
Default

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> Should we talk about it here or on APC?
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

All the same to me

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> With "just in time" fertilization you can do smaller less frequent water changes. Frequent large water changes are part of the estimative index. In that method they function as a flush'n fill reset of parameters. When you are more skilled and can maintain parameters such large water changes are perhaps, wasteful. I am observing slowed growth at about 12 to 16 days and do a 20% water change when I notice this slow down. In my case, the slowdown may be related to hardness nutrients since I only add dGH macros with water changes.

Your ratios seem about right, you might try more fertilizer each day and see what happens over several weeks. Since you seem to be using a test kit, increase amounts until residual N starts to be detectable and try to hold that state. With "just in time" fertilization, you want the point where your plants use most but not all of your supplementation. Feeding and gardening changes will also influence this state. You will need to adjust supplementation to compensate for those changes also. As you come closer to the sweet spot of supplementation you might then fine tune nutrient ratios for desired plant appearance.

It may be just superstition, but I alternate micro and macro ferts to keep P from binding to Fe. You might consider an every other day routine. And, as Tom suggests, always make sure CO2 is attended to before and after fertilization changes.

For comparison, imputing my current weekly totals into fertilator (daily amounts times 3.5, since I alternate micros and macros) yeilds 29.63ppm N, 3.58ppm P, 22.42ppm K and .28 ppm Fe, in a 190w/60g tank. These numbers do assume fertilator calculates correctly... sorry, I'm just too lazy to calculate on paper.
___
Jeff
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

http://www.aquaticplantcentral.com/f...ghlight=#15482

I think each method is geared for the different level of hobbyist. I think the estimated index is aimed at the new person in the hobby and is good because you don't have to test and understand a lot of what is going on.
IUnknown is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
Reply With Quote
Reply


Aquatic Plant Central > Special Interest Forums > Fertilizing > [Wet Thumb Forum]-What method do you use to fertilize your plants?

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2

Copyright © 2006-2011 CrowdGather |  About Aquatic Plant Central |  Advertisers | Investors | Legal | Contact