Go Back   Aquatic Plant Central > Special Interest Forums > Fertilizing
User Name
Password

Advertise on APC

Fertilizing Science of Aquatic Fertilizing - Discuss fertilizing techniques and proper aquatic plant nutrition here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-01-2005, 03:16 AM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
yildirim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Istanbul / TURKEY
Posts: 310
iTrader Ratings: 0
yildirim is a regular member
Plant Points: 7165
Default 23:1 Po4:no3 ???

Hello to all,

I'm a bit confused about the ratios to be kept for PO4 and NO3. At this post "http://www.aquaticplantcentral.com/forumapc/showthread.php?t=2295&highlight=no3%3Apo4", there are so many ratios but what I would like to see is ppm's. 23:1 is also represented by 10:0.4 ppm. Also at some other posts for preventing green spot algea higher PO4 levels are suggested which is now my only concern. It is usualy told to keep PO4 values at 2 ppm for this reason and I wonder if I increase PO4 dosing to optain a steady 2ppm, must I also increase NO3 levels to 50ppm for still having 23:1 (10:0.4) or what. It seems very high to me. Will it go same also for K. Since a month I'm keeping this ratios for NO3:PO4 as 15:1ppm. There isn't any new kind of algea or any decrease at the amount of GSA.

Tank is 120lt-132watt,ph:6.5,gh:8-9,kh:5-6,DIYCO2

I was not sure if I had to send this post to Algea forum or this one, but I tought it is mostly relevant with dosing. I would like to have some easy to understand comments and suggestions for a new beginner.

Thanks to all,
YILDIRIM
yildirim is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Advertisement [Remove Advertisement]

Old 02-01-2005, 03:55 AM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,963
iTrader Ratings: 21
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
niko is a regular member
Plant Points: 72570
Default

Yildirim,

About the Ca:Mg ratio:
There isn't a specific ratio that you must maintain at any cost. Best results seem to come with Ca:Mg ratio of 2:1 to 10:1.

Examples using ppm:

30 ppm Ca
10 ppm Mg
Ca:Mg is 3:1 (30/10=3)

60 ppm Ca
5 ppm Mg
Ca:Mg is 12:1 (60/5=12)

80 ppm Ca
5 ppm Mg
Ca:Mg is 16:1 (80/5=16) <-- in this case the Mg is a bit too low

You probably know how to calculate the Mg by testing for GH and Ca. If not please ask.

--Nikolay
niko is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2005, 05:15 AM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
yildirim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Istanbul / TURKEY
Posts: 310
iTrader Ratings: 0
yildirim is a regular member
Plant Points: 7165
Default Wrong post

Hello Niko,

I think your answer was a wrong post as it is about water hardness not PO4:NO3 dosing ratios.

Thanks,
YILDIRIM
yildirim is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2005, 05:59 AM   #4 (permalink)
Moderator
 
MatPat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 3,819
iTrader Ratings: 34
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
MatPat is a valuable member of the communityMatPat is a valuable member of the community
Plant Points: 133525
Default

I don't think it really matters what ratio you use to dose your tank as long as you don't run out of anything or have too much of anything. I beleive it's more important for the plants to have what they need versus following a certain ratio. I wouldn't dose my tank to 50ppm of NO3 just to keep a ratio correct.

If you want to up your PO4 to 2ppm, increase it slowly and keep an eye on the NO3 as the tank will probably begin to use more NO3, at least for a while.
MatPat is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2005, 10:01 AM   #5 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Edward's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: at home
Posts: 2,027
iTrader Ratings: 0
Edward is a valuable member of the communityEdward is a valuable member of the community
Plant Points: 103755
Default

Hi yildirim

Ratio is not important, maintaining measurable levels is. We need to make sure plants have nutrients available all the time.
Here is the How to test for Nitrates and Phosphates article with more details.

Edward
Edward is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2005, 06:24 AM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
yildirim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Istanbul / TURKEY
Posts: 310
iTrader Ratings: 0
yildirim is a regular member
Plant Points: 7165
Default Maintaining measurable levels !

Hello Edward,

On your reply to my post, you have told that "maintaining measurable levels" are important. Now I wonder if I keep a nutrient level at at least 0.1ppm at all times and not letting it completely depleted, will have the same effect to try keeping it at 1ppm. Because I have this issue for iron and I can never get it higher whether I dose 15ml or 30ml a week. I have asked from one of my friends to test my test kit at his laboratory and he said that it is accurate so I do not suspect from test kit for always giving the same result. But I suspect from Tetra Florapride which is the only trace and iron additive I can find in my country and I can not get any info either from the package or from their website or mails. So this always has been a question mark for me.

Thanks,
YILDIRIM
yildirim is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2005, 07:50 AM   #7 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Edward's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: at home
Posts: 2,027
iTrader Ratings: 0
Edward is a valuable member of the communityEdward is a valuable member of the community
Plant Points: 103755
Default

Hi yildirim

This thread is talking about NO3 and PO4.
A trace element (Fe) is not like that. We can not test reliably for it. You can find details in the Trace Elements (TE) article.

Edward
Edward is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2005, 02:31 PM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: the Swamp
Posts: 2,069
iTrader Ratings: 1
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
plantbrain is a regular member
Plant Points: 4100
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by yildirim
Hello Edward,

On your reply to my post, you have told that "maintaining measurable levels" are important. Now I wonder if I keep a nutrient level at at least 0.1ppm at all times and not letting it completely depleted, will have the same effect to try keeping it at 1ppm. Because I have this issue for iron and I can never get it higher whether I dose 15ml or 30ml a week. I have asked from one of my friends to test my test kit at his laboratory and he said that it is accurate so I do not suspect from test kit for always giving the same result. But I suspect from Tetra Florapride which is the only trace and iron additive I can find in my country and I can not get any info either from the package or from their website or mails. So this always has been a question mark for me.

Thanks,
YILDIRIM
You will find a range of uptake rates that changes as concentration changes.
At the lower end, many plants simply shut down and wait for the nutrient levels to get higher. Their enzymes cannot operate efficiently at very low levels.

Algae on the other hand are still well within range.

You can try many ratios and play with that. As far one ratio being better, generally 10:1 seems good and easy for folks.
But this does not matter........it can be outside the range.

Allowing the NO3/PO4 to fall low can cause issues for a tank's plants.
Especially chronic low ranges.

The other issue with 0.1ppm PO4, there is no practical use for keeping such close narrow ranges. This makes life hard on you dosing.

There are devices such as "chemostats" that do this but they are difficult to keep set up properly.

You can address the trace issue by using the plants as your ultimate test.
Something that should be and is done anyway. Make sure everything else is in good shape, then add more and more traces till you longer see a positive effective. Add more to see, take at least 3 weeks to judge this per routine. Take the max value at max lighting with fast growers, that will give you the most your tank will ever need.

Excess is fine, traces tend cost more so you can back off a little slowly till you see signs. Macro's are cheap so we can add those liberally.

Regards,
Tom Barr
plantbrain is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2005, 04:13 PM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
shalu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 323
iTrader Ratings: 0
shalu is a regular member
Plant Points: 3600
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by plantbrain

Excess is fine, traces tend cost more so you can back off a little slowly till you see signs. Macro's are cheap so we can add those liberally.

Regards,
Tom Barr
But Tom, Traces only cost more if it is TMG or Flourish, many of us are fine with CSM Plantex
shalu is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Aquatic Plant Central > Special Interest Forums > Fertilizing > 23:1 Po4:no3 ???

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0

Copyright © 2006 - 2009 Aquatic Plant Central | About Aquatic Plant Central | Advertising Opportunities | Legal | A member of the Crowdgather Forum Community
Created by Blue Moose Designs