Go Back   Aquatic Plant Central > General Interest Forums > General Aquarium Plants Discussions
User Name
Password

Advertise on APC

General Aquarium Plants Discussions Discuss aquarium plants, aquatic environments, aquarium lighting, aquarium filters, aquarium backgrounds, and other aquarium topics.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-21-2006, 07:22 AM   #1
jcbyrne
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 26
iTrader Ratings: 2
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
jcbyrne is a regular member
Plant Points: 5200
Default Amano and CO2


In his article in the Tropical Fish Hobbyist that just arrived, Amano says that to monitor CO2, measure the ph just before the light goes on in the morning, and again four to five hours later. If it is higher, the amount of CO2 is insufficient, if it is slightly lower, the amount is adequate. If it is much lower the amount of CO2 is excessive.

So, what do you think? What is "slightly lower", "higher" or "much lower"?

jcbyrne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2006, 07:50 AM   #2
hoppycalif
Senior Member
 
hoppycalif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sacramento, CA, USA
Posts: 5,208
iTrader Ratings: 20
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
hoppycalif is a valuable member of the communityhoppycalif is a valuable member of the communityhoppycalif is a valuable member of the community
Plant Points: 227345
Default

It is permitted to disagree even with Amano! So, I do.
hoppycalif is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2006, 07:56 AM   #3
AndyT.
Senior Member
 
AndyT.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 175
iTrader Ratings: 0
AndyT. is a regular member
Plant Points: 15960
Default

Well, think of it this way...

Overnight the plants release CO2 and consume O2... CO2 being acidic, this means that the pH should have dropped over the night.

During the day this reverses, with the plants consuming CO2 and producing O2. If you don't supplement CO2 the normal cycle would be for the morning to be the time with the lowest pH, just before lights come on. The pH should rise throught he day as the CO2 in the aquarium is utilized by the plants.

Back to what Amano says - I think he is indicating that an increase in pH would show that CO2 is being depleted in the aquarium faster than it is being replaced. So any increase would indicate that there is not enough CO2 supplementation (if you assume that the early morning CO2 and pH levels are ideal).

The pH scale is logarithmic and if I recall correctly (always a problem) each 0.1 change represents a 10x change in pH. A change from a pH of 8 to 7 is a 100x change.

So I would go for a decrease in pH of about 0.2 to 0.4 as being okay and anything larger indicating too much CO2 is being added. But that is just my take on it.

The much discussed drop checker is an easy way to use pH to monitor CO2 levels.
AndyT. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2006, 07:58 AM   #4
AndyT.
Senior Member
 
AndyT.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 175
iTrader Ratings: 0
AndyT. is a regular member
Plant Points: 15960
Default

Hoppy, why do you disagree with Amano? The only thing I see as problematic is the assumption that the early morning CO2/pH level is a baseline...
AndyT. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2006, 11:28 AM   #5
hoppycalif
Senior Member
 
hoppycalif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sacramento, CA, USA
Posts: 5,208
iTrader Ratings: 20
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
hoppycalif is a valuable member of the communityhoppycalif is a valuable member of the communityhoppycalif is a valuable member of the community
Plant Points: 227345
Default

A change in pH of 1.0 equals a change in ppm of CO2 of 10X, not 100X.
I disagree with Amano, partly for the thrill of doing so, but mostly because I think we get the best results if we try for 30 ppm of CO2 in the water during the time the lights are on. Generally, that means the pH will be higher in the morning, after the CO2 has been lost due to our slight surface turbulence. Then, as we add CO2 while the lights are on the pH will drop until we hit the equilibrium point where we are adding as much as we are losing through the water surface.

I'm not quite ready to challenge Amano on the quality of my plant growing skills, nor on my aquascaping skills, nor on my algae control, nor............
hoppycalif is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2006, 03:34 PM   #6
DWIZUM
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 57
iTrader Ratings: 6
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
DWIZUM is a regular member
Plant Points: 6300
Default

So hoppy, explain this in plain english - does your method add more or less CO2 than the big guy's?
DWIZUM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2006, 06:18 PM   #7
essabee
Senior Member
 
essabee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Posts: 316
iTrader Ratings: 0
essabee is a regular member
Plant Points: 24000
Default

Hoppycalif is right and so is Amano.

Andy T got the right point. It is the baseline.

Hoppycalif's baseline is the ph at 30ppm CO2. Amano's baseline is at perhaps that at the light on point.

It is certainly a fact that if the ph is higher 4/5 hours after the light on point, the CO2 supply is not equal to consumption.

Also those who have aerator on at light off point will have to find their own baseline.

I think it is totally subjective what you want to do with your CO2. Personally I have decided not to go for maximum growth, only sustained growth, that means fiddling with supply so that the ph goes slightly up or stays level at the end of the light on period.

Last edited by essabee : 12-21-2006 at 07:31 PM. Reason: typo errors
essabee Send an quick message? essabee is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2006, 08:38 PM   #8
AndyT.
Senior Member
 
AndyT.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 175
iTrader Ratings: 0
AndyT. is a regular member
Plant Points: 15960
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hoppycalif View Post
A change in pH of 1.0 equals a change in ppm of CO2 of 10X, not 100X.

I guess you can see why I was a liberal arts major...

Thanks for elucidating. Makes perfect sense now.
AndyT. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2006, 08:21 AM   #9
Salt
Senior Member
 
Salt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 678
iTrader Ratings: 0
Salt is a valuable member of the communitySalt is a valuable member of the community
Plant Points: 17715
Default

Edward and Kekon have posted lots of data showing CO2 levels don't have to be higher than 10 - 20 ppm to achieve fast growth and great looking tanks. Combine that with the countless pictures of tanks by Amano, and there's little questioning it. If you still want to believe you need to have 30 - 100 ppm of CO2 or that you need to turn it up until you see your fish suffering, then go on with your bad self.
Salt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2006, 08:55 AM   #10
Wheeler
Senior Member
 
Wheeler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 105
iTrader Ratings: 0
Wheeler is a regular member
Plant Points: 5600
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hoppycalif View Post
A change in pH of 1.0 equals a change in ppm of CO2 of 10X, not 100X.
I disagree with Amano, partly for the thrill of doing so, but mostly because I think we get the best results if we try for 30 ppm of CO2 in the water during the time the lights are on. Generally, that means the pH will be higher in the morning, after the CO2 has been lost due to our slight surface turbulence. Then, as we add CO2 while the lights are on the pH will drop until we hit the equilibrium point where we are adding as much as we are losing through the water surface.

I'm not quite ready to challenge Amano on the quality of my plant growing skills, nor on my aquascaping skills, nor on my algae control, nor............
This is a problem. The thrill? You think you get "better results", but you don't. I've never seen your tanks, but I KNOW that you don't get better, 100% reapeatable, results than Amano in any sense. Few do...

Amano does it with half the CO2, a small fraction of NO3 and PO4, and easily as much light as any EI tank.... again and again 1000 times over. Right now, Amano is untouchable. I think we'll get him figured out one day, but EI ain't it.
Wheeler is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Aquatic Plant Central > General Interest Forums > General Aquarium Plants Discussions > Amano and CO2

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Aquatic Plant Forum Replies Last Post
Really an Amano? MooseMan Shrimp & other Invertebrates 5 08-03-2006 10:33 AM
Amano and CO2 turtlehead Aquarium Design Group 3 06-17-2006 08:59 AM
pH/CO2 levels for Amano shimp dennis Shrimp & other Invertebrates 7 01-22-2006 12:56 PM
Need to what know Amano is using turtlehead Aquascaping 6 03-04-2005 01:45 PM
Mi Amano www.glass-gardens.com Photography 6 11-12-2004 11:35 AM

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.


Copyright © 2006 - 2008 Aquatic Plant Central | About Aquatic Plant Central | Legal | A member of the Crowdgather Forum Community
Created by Blue Moose Designs
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=