Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BluesBoy Yes, I agree. However, as I mentioned in the first post the aim of this simple survey is to see how much CO2 different tanks are consuming in a long term with different set-ups. Not to measure accurate pH(CO2)-levels.
The pH-logging is just a great tool to se how the tank is responding on different changes in the set-up. The CO2 consumption database is the long-term feedback. For instance: I have reduced my CO2 consumption about 50% (it lasting double mount of time) just to change the cirkulation in the tank  |
Oh heck, I'm not suggesting there's too much error, but just be aware of it.
There are two seperate main things influncing CO2: plant uptake/consumption and off gassing.
There are other things such as CO2 limitations that can force bicarbonate uptake of HCO3- , which changes the CO2 level that's based on the pH, amount organic matter/bacterial respiration, fish load etc
Consumption of CO2 is based on many factors, I've done a fair amount with terrestial systems and LiCor instruments to this extent. This deals with plant CO2 consumption and not off gassing.
Lighting units need to be the same to have a fair comparison, now we get into measuring light which is perhaps even worse. More PAR light=> more CO2 consumption demand. PAR meters are not cheap and many assume they can use lux, you can't do that.
I can have high high PAR and low lux, I can have high Lux and low PAR.
Lux is measured based on our eye, 555nm. PAR is 400-700nm and we could very little Green and lots of Red/Blue in our bulbs. That is huge unknown between tanks compared here and or anywhere.
I'm unwilling to make the assumption lux is a good unit for light.
More CO2=> more nutrient demand and so on.
If one is lacking then the CO2 consumption rate will decline, as will the O2 level, which is a better paratmeter in terms of plant growth/health, tank health.
I think labeling with 14CO2 would be the best way to see.
Not a hobby based thing.
I need to think about it some, I'll see if I can come up with a better method to measure CO2 use in aquatic systems for plants.
But I believe the utility for this data logging is better trend analysis, better methods to reduce CO2 loss and methods to measure such losses or changes that affect CO2 levels.
It makes a good ruler there and I think more folks should do this and the set up is fairly cheap DIY. Thanks, that will be useful for hobbyist rather than the costly stuff I have.
You may want to consider O2 meters and data logging, combined with CO2, this is a very useful tool for CO2 use/plant production.
I have both, as well as temp, Conductivity and Redox.
I think pH/O2 are the two main probes worth using.
While data logging is nice, you can still hand write the data off a pH meter and graph it like like this in Excel etc.
Let me think about some possible ways to improve this measurement of plant consumption and tank consumption to get more standard results that cover the bases better.
Good topic and focus. Folks often return to the basics to realize they are more complex than they once thought.
Regards,
Tom Barr
www.BarrReport.com