Go Back   Aquatic Plant Central > Special Interest Forums > Lighting
User Name
Password

Advertise on APC

Lighting Science of Aquatic Lighting - Aquarium lighting is essential for healthy aquatic plants. Discuss proper aquatic lighting for your plants and fish here.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-22-2006, 10:29 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 1,544
iTrader Ratings: 67
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
epicfish is a regular member
Plant Points: 80632
Default Metal Halide vs. T5 vs. PC options?

I have a few options:

1) used: 2x150 or 2x175w MH setup for a 70 gallon, 48" long tank. Retrofit into an existing canopy. The MH setups I can get used with ~6 month bulbs for $200 total. Each replacement bulb is expected to be around $70 for a total of $140 for two. 300-350watts over 70 gallons -> 4.3 to 5WPG.

2) new: 4x54w T5 HO retrofit into a 48" long tank. This will cost $235 plus bulbs, which are $60, so $295 total. Bulb replacements will cost ~$55. 216 watts over 70 gallons -> 3.1WPG.

3) used: 4x54w SLS Tek fixture with old bulbs. $195 shipped. Bulb replacements will cost ~$55. 216 watts over 70 gallons -> 3.1WPG.

4) used: 6x54w SLS Tek fixture with old bulbs. $295 shipped. (Not economical for me unless I really need 4.6WPG of T5 output)

5) new: 2x55w + 2x36w AHSupply retrofit kits, both with new bulbs, $170 shipped. Bulb replacements will cost ~$84. 182 watts over 70 gallons -> 2.6WPG.

The difference between #2 and #3 is that I'm not sure the Tek fixtures were designed to be mounted into a canopy...is this possible? Would it be bad?

#1 has a lower start-up cost with a high WPG, but the bulb replacement costs are gonna add up pretty fast. I think option #3 would be most economical, but would it viable with my canopy? I threw option #5 out there, but don't think it'd be the best choice right now.

I want to be able to grow high light plants at good growth rates, and I'm guessing that means I'd need around 3+WPG for this tank...if so, the 4x54w would barely get me there. Would I need 3WPG? More? Less?

The reason I'd prefer the 4x54w is that I could run 2x54w for most of the day with 4x54w run for a couple hours...I wouldn't be able to do that with the MH.

So many options...does anyone have a suggestion? Heck, would a DIY T8 "retrofit" system work well? I'd need a ton of bulbs seeing as how I can only find 10000K bulbs that are 36 watts. I'd need 6 bulbs for 216 watts....or ODNO??!

Last edited by epicfish : 10-22-2006 at 10:41 PM.
epicfish is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Advertisement [Remove Advertisement]

 


Aquatic Plant Central > Special Interest Forums > Lighting > Metal Halide vs. T5 vs. PC options?

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0

Copyright © 2006 - 2009 Aquatic Plant Central | About Aquatic Plant Central | Advertising Opportunities | Legal | A member of the Crowdgather Forum Community
Created by Blue Moose Designs