Go Back   Aquatic Plant Central > Special Interest Forums > Lighting
User Name
Password

Advertise on APC

Lighting Science of Aquatic Lighting - Aquarium lighting is essential for healthy aquatic plants. Discuss proper aquatic lighting for your plants and fish here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-25-2009, 02:38 PM   #1 (permalink)
JJF
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3
iTrader Ratings: 0
JJF is a regular member
Plant Points: 400
Default Second Opinion 65G 36x18x24

I would like a second opinion on the choice I'm in the process of making. I would like to get a 65G 36x18x24 tank and a coralife PC 2x96 (192w total) lighting fixture (roughly 2.9wpg) . I also intend on using a co2 setup. Is this a waste of time if I am looking for very heavy plant growth? My other option is to get a 40G breeder tank that would put me areound 4.8 wpg. Is 4.8 overkill? I don't really have any other lighting options either.

Thanks in advance!
JJF is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Advertisement [Remove Advertisement]

Old 03-25-2009, 07:17 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 145
iTrader Ratings: 2
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
jmhart is a regular member
Plant Points: 8500
Default Re: Second Opinion 65G 36x18x24

That's tough.

In general I recommend the 40 breeder over the 65g because the footprint vs height is more amenable to planted tanks.

However, I'm quickly becoming an advocate for reduced lighting. 4.8 wpg will be nothing but a struggle. Algae will always be a headache.

For this reason, and this reason alone, I vote for the 65g.
jmhart is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2009, 12:37 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pearl City, HI
Posts: 412
iTrader Ratings: 36
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
nokturnalkid is a regular member
Plant Points: 26650
Default Re: Second Opinion 65G 36x18x24

My vote would be for the breeder too because of the footprint. If you can stagger when the lights come on, then I think you could get away with that much lighting. If not, then at least raise the lighting a few inches and that should help too. If you get the 65, then that too would be more than enough lighting to go pretty much whatever you want.
nokturnalkid is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2009, 06:09 AM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Kent WA
Posts: 255
iTrader Ratings: 0
Karebear is a regular member
Plant Points: 16100
Default Re: Second Opinion 65G 36x18x24

I would chose the 65 gal. I have a 58 gal which is 4 inches shorter. I really like the size and shape of the tank over the 40 gal much better. With the extra 4 inches of the 65 gal I would lower the lights and water level and allow some of the plants to emerge and grow on top of the water, I really like this look.
Karebear is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2009, 02:33 PM   #5 (permalink)
JJF
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3
iTrader Ratings: 0
JJF is a regular member
Plant Points: 400
Default Re: Second Opinion 65G 36x18x24

The 40 breeder, though I do like the depth, feels weird without the height. I'll go for the 65 and add more lights IF necessary. Thanks for the input guys.
JJF is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2009, 02:57 PM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Minsc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Portland, Or
Posts: 533
iTrader Ratings: 31
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
Minsc is a regular member
Plant Points: 35515
Default Re: Second Opinion 65G 36x18x24

40br is a pretty squat tank. I like them because they don't have a center brace, but plants get to the top really quick!

Placing a 2x96 on either tank, will result in nearly the same amount of effective light. A couple inches of water doesn't radically affect the amount of light in the tank, regardless of what a watt per gallon ratio may tell you!

That is plenty of light to grow any plant.
Minsc is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2009, 05:07 AM   #7 (permalink)
Member
 
lizziotti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 38
iTrader Ratings: 5
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
lizziotti is a regular member
Plant Points: 2400
Default Re: Second Opinion 65G 36x18x24

What about a 50G?
lizziotti is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2009, 01:48 PM   #8 (permalink)
JJF
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3
iTrader Ratings: 0
JJF is a regular member
Plant Points: 400
Default Re: Second Opinion 65G 36x18x24

I really like the 36X18 footprint and its either 40 or 65 at the shop.
JJF is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Aquatic Plant Central > Special Interest Forums > Lighting > Second Opinion 65G 36x18x24

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0

Copyright © 2006 - 2009 Aquatic Plant Central | About Aquatic Plant Central | Advertising Opportunities | Legal | A member of the Crowdgather Forum Community
Created by Blue Moose Designs