View Single Post
Old 07-16-2006, 01:27 PM   #55 (permalink)
BryceM
Administrator
 
BryceM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: South Central Idaho, USA
Posts: 4,262
iTrader Ratings: 42
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
BryceM is an inspiration to us allBryceM is an inspiration to us allBryceM is an inspiration to us allBryceM is an inspiration to us all
Plant Points: 178534
Default

Wow ruki, quite a lenghty response. One of the primary reasons that I enjoy planted tanks is that there is ample subject material for thought. It's nice to stretch one's brain once in a while. It's probably pretty obvious to most people on this board that I sometimes stretch mine a bit too far, hehe.

I am wondering about what you mean by this statement though:

Quote:
Originally Posted by ruki
Don't think the kidneys can produce bicarbonate. Other functions in the body will dissolve bone if neccesary to keep pH from getting too low.
Maintainence of blood bicarbonate is a primary function of the kidney/gill. It might be more correct to state that they regulate readsorption vs excretion, but for all practical purposes it results in the same thing - more bicarbonate in the blood.

As far as I know, skeletal catabolism isn't a primary mechanism for pH control. Osteoclasts will increase their adsorption of bone as a result of many stimuli, but most often this is in response to serum calcium levels, phosphate levels, or various endocrine disorders.

Sorry to get so far off-topic. Your point about other potentially toxic substances dissolving more readily at low pH levels is a good one. In at least one area though, low pH levels can be protective. Ammonia toxicity will be almost impossible at a pH as low as Edward is talking about since it will virtually all be converted immediately to ammonium.
BryceM is offline   Reply With Quote