Layout Critique #3 (Takashi Amano) - Aquascaping - Aquatic Plant Central

Go Back   Aquatic Plant Central > General Interest Forums > Aquascaping

Aquascaping Discuss aquascaping designs and techniques as well as get critiques on your aquascaping pictures. Find out how to use aquatic plants, reefs, and wood to design a planted aquarium.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-25-2004, 02:47 PM   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,707
iTrader Ratings: 2
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
tsunami is a regular member
Default Layout Critique #3 (Takashi Amano)

I'll also be taking ADA/Amano/AGA layout suggestions to post here. Just PM me on which tank you would like to see here.

Aquarium:



Questions an ADA judge would ask (taken from contest booklet...they judge on creativity, composition, fish choice, creation of natural atmosphere, aquarium condition, and viability):

1) Does the aquascape make an original creative impression to the viewers?

2) Is the aquascape composed well (is there compositional balance within the aquascape)?

3) Are the aquatic plants appropriately positioned within the aquascape? Does the balance exist in the colors and shapes of the plants used?

4) Do you feel harmony between the fish and the aquarium layout?

5) Is the aquascape laid out well making a natural looking atmosphere?

Some questions of my own:

1) What compositional rules does this layout follow? Which compositional rules does it break?

2) What are the main elements in this layout? How do they work together harmoniously (or unharmoniously)?

3) What type of atmosphere/impression does this layout seem to create for the viewer?

Just questions to help aid discussion. However, discussion can head in directions that have nothing to do with the above questions (but still relate to the above aquascape).

Carlos
tsunami is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisement [Remove Advertisement]
Old 07-26-2004, 08:51 AM   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 99
iTrader Ratings: 0
Roger Miller is a regular member
Default Re: Layout Critique #3 (Takashi Amano)

Quote:
Originally Posted by tsunami
1) Does the aquascape make an original creative impression to the viewers?
Actually this looks to me like a Thomas Kinkade painting, For instance

or


Quote:
2) Is the aquascape composed well (is there compositional balance within the aquascape)?
Very well balanced. The bright reds might cover a slightly too-large area. The sense of depth is pretty amazing, and even enhanced by the slight cloudiness in the water.

Quote:
3) Are the aquatic plants appropriately positioned within the aquascape? Does the balance exist in the colors and shapes of the plants used?
The placement of red plants is very effective. The right foreground seems a little busy. Probably one of those plant species is unnecessary.

Quote:
5) Is the aquascape laid out well making a natural looking atmosphere?
This image does not seem at all natural to me.

Quote:
Some questions of my own:

1) What compositional rules does this layout follow? Which compositional rules does it break?
Use of the golden section isn't obvious. The plants are arranged in very "Dutch" groups which is a little unusual for Amano.

Quote:
2) What are the main elements in this layout? How do they work together harmoniously (or unharmoniously)?
The mid-ground funnel focusing attention on hole in the upper center, framed by red plants; the bright surface and the dark foreground.

Quote:
3) What type of atmosphere/impression does this layout seem to create for the viewer?
Like the Kinkade pictures, a little tacky.


Roger Miller
Roger Miller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2004, 09:37 AM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Posts: 1,035
iTrader Ratings: 3
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
pineapple is a regular member
Default

I think the main design element is based on an off-beat symmetricity.

"Over the tree line" one can see light to the back. The viewer is given an ambiguous escape route. A good deal of front-back depth is implied with lines and light (colour of plants implying light).

To say one likes or dislikes such a work of art is really rather irrelevant. It is a work of art.

"Aquascape" is a strange term. Many of these designs (not only Amano aquariums) use a terrestrial landscape as the metaphor, whether it be a Chinese "shan shui" (mountain water) or an English (or Dutch) Country Garden. Aquatic view emulating nature as we know it on land.

Andrew Cribb
pineapple is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Old 07-26-2004, 11:46 AM   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 215
iTrader Ratings: 0
Jeff Kropp is a regular member
Default

What this photo has in common with the Kinkade images posted by Rodger Miller is 1 point perspective. From how steep the glass angles appear at the sides of the tank I guess this to be a corner tank. A corner tank would be very prone to 1 point perspective layouts. Personaly, I work to avoid a single triangle foreground or 1 point perspective. I don't like feeling cornered, a 1 point perspective often makes me feel like I am being inexorably funneled into a final destination. Those Kinkade images play with a feeling of having so comfortably arrived at that destination that sentimental pleasure alone will suffice human intelect ...barf. While this scape is somewhat sentimental it doesn't make simplistic presumtions about human culture. It elevates the value set promoted by ADA and uses a nice mix of slow growing species to create an illusion of permanance.

Now one might argue that, the ADA value set is as calculated and contrived as a Kinkade painting but I do not share this conviction. In my opinion, the ADA value set reflects a cultural/spiritual perspective that has endured for hundreds, if not thousands of years, while a Kinkade painting panders to shallow childish sentementality. In embracing the meditative contemplation of nature, the ADA value set opens up many interrelated avenues of understanding. I never feel cornered when veiwing a well rendered example; even when that example is built into a corner.
___
Jeff
Jeff Kropp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2004, 01:39 PM   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,707
iTrader Ratings: 2
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
tsunami is a regular member
Default

Surprisingly, this aquarium is a 90x45x45cm --a typical 50g.

As for the unnaturalness bits...
There is a lake here with homogenous mounds of a Hemianthus sp. interspersed with brightly colored bunches of Ludwigia repens, spikes of hairgrass, and limestone rocks set at angles. If I would shoot an underwater photo of these shorelines, most would say they are contrived aquascapes.

It would be interesting to read what people think when they imagine a "natural" looking tank. I think many of Amano's layouts look quite natural, judging by what I see in the many bodies of water here in south Florida.

But don't let that continue the observations/comments from other readers...

Carlos
tsunami is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2004, 02:28 PM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Posts: 1,035
iTrader Ratings: 3
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
pineapple is a regular member
Default

Having just spent a week or so snorkeling around two lakes in Vermont, I can imagine the different views of "natural" lacustrine flora (and fauna) we have seen. Natural in Vermont means slates, some marble, contorted rocks, sandy shorelines with plenty of red valisneria sp. and Myriophyllum spicatum (Eurasian milfoil), various types of algae....

"The truth is stranger than fiction" as they say in publishing.

Andrew Cribb
pineapple is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2004, 02:39 PM   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 99
iTrader Ratings: 0
Roger Miller is a regular member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tsunami
It would be interesting to read what people think when they imagine a "natural" looking tank.
It would be interesting to read why people think it is important for something as obviously contrived as an aquarium to appear natural. I'm reasonably happy with aquariums that look surreal. I'm even happy with aquariums that look like gardens--they don't even have to look like Japanese gardens to make me happy.

Once we work out the importance of looking natural then we can start to work on how something can look both "natural" and "creative"; the first would seem to imply the absence of human influence and the second would be meaningless without human influence.


Roger Miller
Roger Miller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2004, 01:46 AM   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 49
iTrader Ratings: 0
TPIRman is a regular member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Kropp
Now one might argue that, the ADA value set is as calculated and contrived as a Kinkade painting but I do not share this conviction. In my opinion, the ADA value set reflects a cultural/spiritual perspective that has endured for hundreds, if not thousands of years, while a Kinkade painting panders to shallow childish sentementality. In embracing the meditative contemplation of nature, the ADA value set opens up many interrelated avenues of understanding.
Apples and oranges. If we're talking about value sets, then we have to acknowledge that the Thomas Kinkade value set is that of a devout Anglo-Saxon Protestant -- Kinkade's art is pretty straightforward in this respect. Indeed, Kinkade is straightforward to the point of being ham-fisted, which is why I'm not a fan of his work either. But this lack of subtlety has little to do with the relative merits of the artists' values. Protestant Christianity as a "cultural/spiritual perspective" has a pretty considerable history, itself.

I also have to raise my eyebrows at the ethereal terms -- "cultural/spiritual perspective," "the meditative contemplation of nature," "interrelated avenues of understanding." These sound like hedges against more concrete definitions of Amano's value set. If that value set really has endured for centuries, it probably has a name, so why are we fumbling for the right words here?

Of course, the Amano value set doesn't have a name because it is a thoroughly postmodern product of its times. It is shaped by cultures and histories, of course, but it borrows liberally from various contexts, with little respect for the sanctity of any one value system. This is not a knock -- rather a nod to the complexity of a supposed ADA value set.

The complexity makes it hard to apply labels. There are superficial (again, not using this term negatively) traces of "Zen" and Shinto in Amano, but in his books he has also demonstrated the influence of African (esp. West African) native cultures -- and, of course, this cultural pastiche is tempered by an ecumenical devotion to the scientific method.

One convenient label that I think Jeff hinted at, and which Amano encourages, is that the ADA approach is somehow quintessentially "Japanese." Amano writes in NAW 1: "This unique sense of nature, this wabi-sabi, pervades every aspect of Japanese life, from gardening and bonsai to the tea ceremony and ikebana... to many aspects of daily life." This is not an uncommon sentiment. To me, it smacks of oversimplification and orientalism, especially since the Japanese wabi-sabi "other" is often cast against the European/American/Western occident. You can observe this frequently in Amano's writings. Even ignoring the impossible complexity volatility of a label like "Japanese," the orientalist stance doesn't work because it fails to acknowledge Amano's penchant for cross-cultural appropriation.

"Nature" is the other other label we seek to apply, but others on this board have already examined the difficulties there. To recap: What the hell is "nature"?

One point that needs to be made: Amano has never held his aquascapes up to the restrictive standard that many on this board seek to apply, in which the "natural" aquarium resembles an aquatic environment in the wild. Amano aquascapes use natural forms as a source for inspiration, but the resulting works are evocations, rather than approximations, of their natural subjects.

Amano also (rightly, IMO) rejects the nature-vs.-artifice binary. One of the essays accompanying an aquascape in NAW 1 is entitled "Artifice Over Nature," and it concludes with this quote: "Yes, such a beautiful waterscape doesn't exist in nature. Only artifice made by human hands can attain this beauty."

Amano regards nature as his inspiration, but he also considers his human artifice as an extension of nature's beauty. Artifice can both emulate nature and surpass it. This is a more nuanced view than the black-and-white nature/artifice opposition that some are attributing to Amano and ADA.

It's also relevant to note here that nature is not held up as the golden standard by which an aquascape is judged -- that honor goes to the even more difficult concept of "beauty." So what is beauty? I'm not going to touch that one with a ten-foot pole.

This is not to say that other conceptions of "nature" as it pertains to aquascaping are incorrect, but since we are using ADA criteria, it's helpful to consider the ADA perspective. I believe that Amano's own work and writings demonstrate that the ADA value set is too amorphous, complex, and occasionally self-contradictory to be summed up as the "contemplation of nature." It's convenient to use words like "cultural," "spiritual," "Japanese," or "nature" in this exercise, but we have to recognize that these are loaded terms, defying a pat, concrete definition.

This is especially true in the case of a postmodern artist like Amano who employs signifiers with little regard for the original context. If you take his yen for Zen too seriously, you'll get confused -- Amano's "Zen" is a purposefully superficial gloss of the real thing. Same with Shinto, same with East-vs.-West, etc. For Amano, connotation is more important than denotation.
TPIRman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2004, 08:17 AM   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 99
iTrader Ratings: 0
Roger Miller is a regular member
Default

I am interested to read Jeff's response, if he choses to make one. For my part I will start here...
Quote:
Originally Posted by TPIRman
"Nature" is the other other label we seek to apply, but others on this board have already examined the difficulties there. To recap: What the hell is "nature"?

One point that needs to be made: Amano has never held his aquascapes up to the restrictive standard that many on this board seek to apply, in which the "natural" aquarium resembles an aquatic environment in the wild. Amano aquascapes use natural forms as a source for inspiration, but the resulting works are evocations, rather than approximations, of their natural subjects.

Amano also (rightly, IMO) rejects the nature-vs.-artifice binary. One of the essays accompanying an aquascape in NAW 1 is entitled "Artifice Over Nature," and it concludes with this quote: "Yes, such a beautiful waterscape doesn't exist in nature. Only artifice made by human hands can attain this beauty."

Amano regards nature as his inspiration, but he also considers his human artifice as an extension of nature's beauty. Artifice can both emulate nature and surpass it. This is a more nuanced view than the black-and-white nature/artifice opposition that some are attributing to Amano and ADA.
I think you have provided us with some interesting points about what "natural" is not.. That leaves me still wondering what "natural" is. I don't think this is a case where the process of elimination is a useful tool for deduction. From your earlier discussion it seems you believe that Amano picks and chooses his concepts to fit his purposes rather than to meet a fixed definition. In that case is it likely that in the context of the ADA contest "looks natural" means nothing more than "looks like something Amano might do"?

Returning briefly to things that aren't natural -- and to a more concrete critique of the picture that Carlos offered this week -- I'd like to point out a few features that prompted my comment that the aquascape did not look natural.

I've never seen blue (er, cyan?) crypts like those in the far right midground and I can't regard them as looking natural -- even given wide leeway in how that term might be defined. I also don't think that yellowish-cream is a natural or healthy color for the narrow leafed java fern in the right optical center of the photo. More generally I think that both the color saturation and the contrast in the image are not only unnatural, but probably not authentic; they bear more similarity to the bizzaro-world colors used by Kinkade than they do to anything I've seen in an aquarium.

Obviously these comments address the image more than they address the aquascape.

Quote:
It's also relevant to note here that nature is not held up as the golden standard by which an aquascape is judged -- that honor goes to the even more difficult concept of "beauty." So what is beauty? I'm not going to touch that one with a ten-foot pole.
As I understand from Carlos' description, ADA does ask the judges to use "natural" as a criteria for ranking aquascapes. That's how the whole issue came up. ADA does not ask the the judges to rank entries based on their beauty. None of the contests I'm familiar with ask the judges to rank aquascapes on their beauty. I'm not saying it doesn't happen.


Roger Miller
Roger Miller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2004, 10:00 AM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
ShaneSmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gainesville/Winter Park, Florida
Posts: 645
iTrader Ratings: 5
iTrader Positive Rating: 100%
ShaneSmith is a regular member
Default

Has anyone seen a narrow leaved java fern in nature? What about a Crypt wendtii? I think it would be hard to say what is natural and what is not without seeing these naturally. Now plants will definantly look yellow in nature... go outside in the morning in florida. And the crypt being that shade of blue does not look weird to me eithere.... go outside under some shade, certain plants look blue.

These are just observations from living in the woods. I personally think it looks natural... just the best of nature.
ShaneSmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Aquatic Plant Central > General Interest Forums > Aquascaping > Layout Critique #3 (Takashi Amano)

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Aquatic Plant Forum Replies Last Post
Layout Critique #15 (Takashi Amano) tsunami Aquascaping 20 06-07-2010 07:58 PM
Layout Critique #12 (Takashi Amano) tsunami Aquascaping 13 10-10-2004 09:44 AM
Layout Critique #2 (Takehiko Honoki) tsunami Aquascaping 16 07-20-2004 08:07 AM
Layout Critique #1 (Takashi Amano) tsunami Aquascaping 8 07-16-2004 05:40 PM
Weekly topic: An interview with Jeff Senske tsunami Aquascaping 6 04-23-2004 01:40 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1