Joined
·
43 Posts
I actually read (ok...skimmed) a few interesting articles after my interest was piqued.
Effect of boundary layer transport on the fixation of carbon by the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera
I couldn't find this one in the databases, but I'll try again tomorrow. The abstract contained this interesting statement, though:
http://www.mediafire.com/?a9dvlukzg7czwbn
Beyond light: physical, geological, and geochemical parameters as possible submersed aquatic vegetation habitat requirements
http://www.mediafire.com/?bzw1tng221vgjag
This had a TON of awesome information. For example:
Effect of boundary layer transport on the fixation of carbon by the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera
I couldn't find this one in the databases, but I'll try again tomorrow. The abstract contained this interesting statement, though:
Velocity gradients and turbulence around macrophyte stands in streams"Experiments in water tunnels indicate that the boundary layer adjacent to the M. pyrifera blade may be turbulent in water speeds as low as 1 cm sec-1. Photosynthetic output of the blade can be increased by a factor of 300% by increasing water speeds over the blade surface from 0 to 4 cm sec-1. This is consistent with a decrease in the thickness of the boundary layer. Above 4 cm sec-1, the assimilation of carbon was limiting."
http://www.mediafire.com/?a9dvlukzg7czwbn
You can't trust your intuition as to if it's laminar or turbulent - you have to measure the flows. This article talked about how the plant beds alter the flow. The flows can become more OR less turbulent depending on plant bed characteristics.Turbulence was maintained in the attenuated flow inside the plant canopies, despite estimates of low Reynolds numbers, demonstrating that reliable evaluation of flow patterns requires direct measurements.
Beyond light: physical, geological, and geochemical parameters as possible submersed aquatic vegetation habitat requirements
http://www.mediafire.com/?bzw1tng221vgjag
This had a TON of awesome information. For example:
meaning that in streams and rivers, the turbulence is caused by the shear forces with the channel bed, whereas it was caused by the plants themselves in lakes (where the flow is due to wind driven waves). Also:Production of turbulence within the vegetation is dominated by the plant wake rather than by the bottom boundary shear, as in open channel flows (Nepf et al. 1997).
meaning it might be best for the flow to start out laminar but transition to turbulent as it hits the plants! There's a lot more to dig out in this paper, but I don't have time to read the whole thing. Someone please post any more interesting bits if you have a chance to read more.The optimal turbulence levels for SAV is yet unknown but it is interesting to note that most SAV beds tend to occur in areas where flow is characterized by the laminar-turbulent transition (Ackerman 1998)