So, yesterday marked the one-year anniversary of my latest tank set-up, a large Chinese porcelain bowl with about a half-inch of gravel and a maximum of six zebra danio glo-fish. By the time I arrived at this forum, I had already experienced a few months of low tech, low-sunlight, aquarium maintenance and was on the cusp of understanding the difference between what I had and a true Walstad tank.
I was over the moon at being able to go for months with -0- ammonia ppm readings without a mechanical filter - and, significantly - no algae. But, I was increasingly puzzled over how so many readers could go for months reporting -0- nitrates? And, what was all this talk about "rapid plant growth"? That description certainly did not apply to my evergreen-like
anubias barteri. Nor did it describe my five sticks of lucky bamboo, apparently doing the lion's share of nutrient removal.
In many ways, this journal has been a chronicle of my backing my way into a Walstad set-up. I did everything in reverse order. I was nearly always carefully working around six fish, trying very hard not to poison them. Indeed, my first plants were chosen in order to avoid having to deal with actual soil: duckweed,
salvinia minima and, of course, those five sticks of lucky bamboo.
When finally I introduced some dirt to the situation, it was in the form of a potted lily. Thank you,
@mistergreen.
And, that sort of did it for me. I no longer treated organic soil as radioactive. It could be introduced in controllable amounts.
The lotus plants were an education in and of themselves. They aren't exactly fast-growing in the sense that they don't really need soil until they separate themselves from their bulbs. But, once they do. Wow. Their root systems occupy the entire bottom of the porcelain bowl.
Bottom line: I can go for months now with -0- ppms nitrates.
ETA: As far as I am concerned, the jury is still out on Safe-T-Sorb (STS) as an anaerobic bacteria filter. I still keep a container of it at the bottom of my bowl. In the final analysis, it remains to be seen which played the bigger role in pushing my nitrate levels lower- the STS or the addition of a lot of new plants? If I ever start a second tank, I will introduce it a lot earlier and compare the results.
ETA: I should also mention that in the process of figuring out how to care for the first water lily which was germinated from a rhizome, I purchased a floor lamp, the first artificial lighting I'd ever had for the porcelain bowl since I purchased it twenty years ago. This resulted in my first experience with algae in as many years. And, it was from that experience, and
@ronnie 's recommendation that I introduced a single pond snail, a stow-away on one of the tiger lotuses, into the bowl. It has proved to be one of the wisest hobby decisions I've ever made. Not only do they take care of algae but do a bang up job of disposing of rotting lily pads - thus doing their part in keeping the water surface clear of too much cover.
tltr:dr: