Adding toxic levels of Hg is going to kill anything if you get beyond small trace amounts. 10ppm is not a small of Hg, Pb, As etc by any measure.
This is a toxicity study using very toxic metals at high levels for remediation of wastewater streams.
If you to include these into the enzymatic uptake rates/models, you'll also add a drop off in uptake as the levels of substrate get very high and into the toxic range/s.
So you get a fast curve at low concentrations building up to a flat level for a time, then at the toxic levels the Vmax declines.
Sort of a table top plateau shaped graph.
But if you plan on adding Hg, Ni, Cu, Zn etc at levels beyond 5-10ppm, you got issues anyway.
The study also suggest adding higher levels of macro nutrients helps increase the uptake of trace metals(I would assume this to be true for Fe & Cu and as disscussed, Zn).
Regards,
Tom Barr
Regards,
Tom Barr
This is a toxicity study using very toxic metals at high levels for remediation of wastewater streams.
If you to include these into the enzymatic uptake rates/models, you'll also add a drop off in uptake as the levels of substrate get very high and into the toxic range/s.
So you get a fast curve at low concentrations building up to a flat level for a time, then at the toxic levels the Vmax declines.
Sort of a table top plateau shaped graph.
But if you plan on adding Hg, Ni, Cu, Zn etc at levels beyond 5-10ppm, you got issues anyway.
The study also suggest adding higher levels of macro nutrients helps increase the uptake of trace metals(I would assume this to be true for Fe & Cu and as disscussed, Zn).
Regards,
Tom Barr
Regards,
Tom Barr