[plantbrain]

It should.

It'll work better at lower light(using low KH's) since there is less CO2 demand and less potential for the plants/bacteria using up the KH for a carbon source.

But in theory, I think a KH of 1-2 if fine.
Keeping it there(the KH) might mess with you depending on your routine and system.

A KH of 2 is generally fine.
Do not rely entirely on the pH controller to take care of all things CO2 for you, you will need to keep a close eye on the KH, you wanted to keep the KH at a low narrow range, so that's your new job, I do weekly large water changes and have a slightly higher KH and then I never have to worry. Even if you are breeding Apisto's, I really do not think you need to go this low. They have done well at 2KH and unless you are breeding wild stock, I see no reason to go this low.
Work of the diet more, less on the KH.

Regards,
Tom Barr

 

[plantbrain]

I've grown Tonia very very well at a KH/GH of 3/5.

Try more light and less crowding, more traces/CO2/NO3.

I think it's not that nice of a plant personally, looks a lot like Lagarosiphon's and Egeria's which if you need a suitable species, try E najas, thing grows 2" a day.

The Tonia branches a lot when I had it and I had 20 plants before long.

Rather than looking at softer waters, you should consider that the plant might need nore NO3, light/CO2 and other things that make plants grow.

I've suggested this method for a very long time instead of accepting the notion that plants prefer soft water.

It's an issue of growth and needs, give the plant what it needs to grow.

While someone might have gotten some growth with their soft water method, I've had NO trouble growing it very well without super soft water.

So if you requires soft water, why did mine grow so well?
Focus on the aspects that help plants grow the most first, then try other things like KH.

As far as a rule: higher KH's harder water have better plant growth and one could therefore suggest that plants prefer harder waters in nature and IME in planted tanks.

Softer waters need less traces to have the same effect so you might double the trace dosing also. I've always added far more traces than anyone ever suggested in the past, now folks add fair amounts.

Regards,
Tom Barr

 

[plantbrain]

I keep the nutrients higher than the other plants "need" as well.

I dose more NO3, about 11ppm every other day and about 1.5x more trace.

I used no substrate fertilization (aged Flourite), very few fish, low bioload etc. are coming from as far as a problem plant and the soft water issue. Everytime I've re evaluated this, I've burned myself and proved myself wrong.

I've honestly felt the same and searched for differences, I cannot find them, I am always vigilent for that one soft water only plant, if it does exist, but that holy grail has yet to have been found by me.

In order for something to be true, such as PO4 causes algae, you must show that in controlled conditions that PO4 dosing causes algae.

If not, the algae must be being caused by something OTHER than PO4, this is no different.

I've already stated I've grown it at a KH/GH combo higher than many say.
So I already know it works.


The CO2 was very high, light, nutrients etc.

I will not rule out some help from the substrate, this plant did produce a fairly strong root system. Being a SA plant, it is very likely amphibious and from the natural pics I've seen, is found in shallow faster flowing water.

A frozen peat ball might help.

I did not try that, I had no issues with the plant although many folks seem to and most everyone seems to believe that soft water will cure their issue.

I highly doubt it, at least as it being the cause of the growth problem.


Regards,
Tom Barr

 

[plantbrain]

A KH of 2 is fine for all practical purposes.
I and other's suggest 3 mainly as a large margine of error, but 2 or 1 will work if you want.

My issue is that it's not the KH, KH is not a nutrient unless it's reduced to CO2=>sugar.

Therefore harder water will have a more stable eniroment and also have more Carbon should the CO2 run low.

This is why you find better plant growth is harder waters=> more nutrients.

Plants that live in spartan environments live not because they like it, they are there because they are poor competitors elsewhere.

Many plants fall into this same situation and have similar traits. This is not just an aquatic issue.

Tonia is fairly slow growing vs Egeria najas which is very fast, but Tonia has a special niche that allows it to grow slow, but better in nutrient poor environments. It has a better root development and one could argue is therefore better adapted to poor water column conditions than Egeria.

But it does not mean it perfers it!

Non CO2 methods changes the rate, Proserpinaca grows wonderful in non CO2 systems with softer water as well, but doe sgreat in CO2 hard water systems too.

It's a nice plant, but it's not the cat's meow IMO.
Hey, you have 300 other species to grow, come back later and try it out again. I told you what I did.

Eriocaulon is a very beautiful plant. It does well and so did everything I tried out in that same tank, I had to give away buckets of B japonica, Red Cabomba, hairgrass etc.

Folks said these were all soft water plants also way back when. It's a fall back if someone cannot explain something, no one has shown me why there is a basis for it in terms of plant growth and I have yet to have found anything other than some observations/speculations, my own included over the years.

Often said, but never proved. Well, I guess I'll get to it at some point.
The research done to date suggest harder, no softer water produces better growth in several common aquatic sumbersed plants(Pondweed, Milfoil, Hydrilla).

Regards,
Tom Barr