Aquatic Plant Forum banner

Questions about the Aquatic Gardeners Association

4026 Views 22 Replies 14 Participants Last post by  pineapple
Hey all,

After talking with a number of people about the AGA it's come to my attention that a lot of folks who are "up to date" with the state of the hobby, particularly those involved in discussion boards like APC, aren't satisfied by what the AGA offers its members. Since the AGA exists solely to help the hobby and the hobbyists who make it up it's important that the AGA keep up with its members and their needs/desires.

Would you please take some time to tell me what you like and dislike about membership in the AGA? Specifically, and constructively, speaking to the points which you feel need change will be of the most help.

The only thing I'd like to say before this is, if you're not satisfied with the articles in TAG and the information it does/does not provide it's up to you to submit articles. TAG is almost exclusively written by the AGA membership, but we can't publish what we don't get. It's up to you to make TAG what you want it to be.

With that, please, write away. If you're not comfortable writing something for public view, please send it in an email to me:

[email protected]

Thank you,
1 - 1 of 23 Posts
I have to disagree. Not only is Amano's article in TAG the only information in English we get to read, it is also usually the only aquascaping article in the entire magazine. Rather than shortening Amano's work, I would actually simply /increase/ the number of articles.

Of course, this takes work and commitment. Members will have to submit articles and photography for this to be successful. Has anyone been doing that? Very few.

1 - 1 of 23 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.